Erratum to: Touristic site attractiveness seen through Twitter
EPJ Data Science volume 5, Article number: 16 (2016)
Unfortunately, the original version of this article  contained several errors. The numbers in Table 3 should have been divided by two and the title of the table should have been “Ranking of nodes based on the fraction of the total weight” instead of “Ranking of nodes based on the total weight”. Accordingly, the sentence “The Eiffel Tower alone accounted for a 50% of the total weighted degree” in Section 3.3 “Network of touristic sites” should have read “The Eiffel Tower alone accounted for a 25% of the total weighted degree”.
The correct Table 3 is included in full in this erratum.
Bassolas A, Lenormand M, Tugores A, Gonçalves B, Ramasco JJ (2016) Touristic site attractiveness seen through Twitter. EPJ Data Sci 5:12. doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0073-5
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0073-5.
About this article
Cite this article
Bassolas, A., Lenormand, M., Tugores, A. et al. Erratum to: Touristic site attractiveness seen through Twitter. EPJ Data Sci. 5, 16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0077-1