Skip to main content

Advertisement

Erratum to: Touristic site attractiveness seen through Twitter

Article metrics

  • 1142 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

The original article was published in EPJ Data Science 2016 5:12

Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained several errors. The numbers in Table 3 should have been divided by two and the title of the table should have been “Ranking of nodes based on the fraction of the total weight” instead of “Ranking of nodes based on the total weight”. Accordingly, the sentence “The Eiffel Tower alone accounted for a 50% of the total weighted degree” in Section 3.3 “Network of touristic sites” should have read “The Eiffel Tower alone accounted for a 25% of the total weighted degree”.

Table 3 Ranking of nodes based on the fraction of the total weight

The correct Table 3 is included in full in this erratum.

References

  1. 1.

    Bassolas A, Lenormand M, Tugores A, Gonçalves B, Ramasco JJ (2016) Touristic site attractiveness seen through Twitter. EPJ Data Sci 5:12. doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0073-5

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Maxime Lenormand.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0073-5.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bassolas, A., Lenormand, M., Tugores, A. et al. Erratum to: Touristic site attractiveness seen through Twitter. EPJ Data Sci. 5, 16 (2016) doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0077-1

Download citation