Skip to main content

Table 8 Results of random effects regressions on individual centrality and position of people

From: The effect of anti-money laundering policies: an empirical network analysis

 

Dependent variable

 

Centrality measures

Transitivity

Constraint

 

Degree

Betweenness

Closeness

Laundry

1.788∗

0.0003

−0.242∗∗∗

0.009

−0.182∗∗∗

(1.074)

(0.001)

(0.051)

(0.034)

(0.059)

No Laundry

0.489∗∗

0.0001

0.012

−0.0003

−0.031∗∗∗

(0.195)

(0.0002)

(0.009)

(0.006)

(0.011)

After AML4

0.901∗∗∗

0.002∗∗∗

−0.107∗∗∗

−0.004∗∗∗

−0.017∗∗∗

(0.035)

(0.0001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.002)

Laundry: After AML4

0.933∗∗∗

0.005∗∗∗

0.049∗∗∗

−0.026∗∗

−0.084∗∗∗

(0.293)

(0.001)

(0.012)

(0.011)

(0.013)

No Laundry: After AML4

0.224∗∗∗

0.0005∗∗∗

−0.008∗∗∗

−0.0001

0.002

(0.047)

(0.0001)

(0.002)

(0.002)

(0.002)

Constant

2.824∗∗∗

0.0003∗∗

0.496∗∗∗

0.043∗∗∗

0.833∗∗∗

(0.115)

(0.0001)

(0.005)

(0.004)

(0.006)

Observations

17,649

17,649

17,649

17,649

17,649

\(R^{2}\)

0.040

0.025

0.262

0.0002

0.144

Adjusted \(R^{2}\)

0.039

0.025

0.261

−0.0001

0.143

F Statistic (df = 5; 17643)

140.373∗∗∗

91.812∗∗∗

1249.580∗∗∗

−2.104

572.798∗∗∗

  1. Note: ∗p<0.1; ∗∗p<0.05; ∗∗∗p<0.01.