From: The effect of anti-money laundering policies: an empirical network analysis
Dependent variable | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Centrality measures | Transitivity | Constraint | |||
Degree | Betweenness | Closeness | |||
Laundry | 1.788∗ | 0.0003 | −0.242∗∗∗ | 0.009 | −0.182∗∗∗ |
(1.074) | (0.001) | (0.051) | (0.034) | (0.059) | |
No Laundry | 0.489∗∗ | 0.0001 | 0.012 | −0.0003 | −0.031∗∗∗ |
(0.195) | (0.0002) | (0.009) | (0.006) | (0.011) | |
After AML4 | 0.901∗∗∗ | 0.002∗∗∗ | −0.107∗∗∗ | −0.004∗∗∗ | −0.017∗∗∗ |
(0.035) | (0.0001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.002) | |
Laundry: After AML4 | 0.933∗∗∗ | 0.005∗∗∗ | 0.049∗∗∗ | −0.026∗∗ | −0.084∗∗∗ |
(0.293) | (0.001) | (0.012) | (0.011) | (0.013) | |
No Laundry: After AML4 | 0.224∗∗∗ | 0.0005∗∗∗ | −0.008∗∗∗ | −0.0001 | 0.002 |
(0.047) | (0.0001) | (0.002) | (0.002) | (0.002) | |
Constant | 2.824∗∗∗ | 0.0003∗∗ | 0.496∗∗∗ | 0.043∗∗∗ | 0.833∗∗∗ |
(0.115) | (0.0001) | (0.005) | (0.004) | (0.006) | |
Observations | 17,649 | 17,649 | 17,649 | 17,649 | 17,649 |
\(R^{2}\) | 0.040 | 0.025 | 0.262 | 0.0002 | 0.144 |
Adjusted \(R^{2}\) | 0.039 | 0.025 | 0.261 | −0.0001 | 0.143 |
F Statistic (df = 5; 17643) | 140.373∗∗∗ | 91.812∗∗∗ | 1249.580∗∗∗ | −2.104 | 572.798∗∗∗ |