Skip to main content

Table 1 Average citation metrics of 4×100 researchers randomly sampled from the corresponding Wikipedia categories (bibliographical data are taken from Scopus)

From: The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics

Field

# Papers

Citations

Citation per Paper

h-index

# co-authors

Years active

Field ave. h-index

h-index above field ave.

Biol

166 (±24)

5,612 (±932)

33 (±4)

23 (±2)

92 (±6)

32 (±2)

22

36%

CoSi

92 (±9)

1,638 (±219)

19 (±2)

13 (±1)

75 (±5)

25 (±1)

15

31%

Phys

139 (±16)

3,512 (±447)

27 (±4)

19 (±2)

95 (±6)

31 (±1)

33

22%

Psyc

78 (±14)

3,081 (±623)

30 (±4)

15 (±2)

60 (±6)

40 (±11)

21

24%

  1. The last column shows the proportion of researchers in the sample whose h-index was above the field average (field-specific averages of h-indexes were taken from previous research [10, 39]). The numbers in parentheses are the standard errors of the average.