Table 1 Controlled correlations between the socio-economic diversity of visitors and the amenity complexity of neighborhoods
From: Amenity complexity and urban locations of socio-economic mixing
Coefficient of variation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
Neighborhood complexity | 0.125∗∗∗ | 0.125∗∗∗ | |||
(0.036) | (0.038) | ||||
Amenity diversity | −0.148∗ | −0.162∗∗ | |||
(0.076) | (0.074) | ||||
Avg amenity ubiquity | −0.049 | −0.017 | |||
(0.049) | (0.050) | ||||
Centrality of location | 0.130∗∗∗ | 0.089∗∗∗ | 0.129∗∗∗ | 0.123∗∗∗ | 0.087∗∗∗ |
(0.027) | (0.028) | (0.026) | (0.027) | (0.028) | |
Population (log) | −0.053∗∗ | −0.050∗∗ | −0.049∗∗ | −0.047∗∗ | −0.043∗ |
(0.022) | (0.022) | (0.022) | (0.023) | (0.022) | |
Nr visitors (log) | 0.047 | 0.039 | 0.054∗ | 0.045 | 0.046 |
(0.029) | (0.029) | (0.029) | (0.029) | (0.029) | |
Nr POIs (log) | −0.001 | 0.006 | 0.047 | −0.013 | 0.054 |
(0.023) | (0.023) | (0.033) | (0.026) | (0.034) | |
Constant | 0.424∗∗∗ | 0.363∗∗∗ | 0.360∗∗∗ | 0.460∗∗∗ | 0.306∗∗∗ |
(0.056) | (0.057) | (0.064) | (0.066) | (0.075) | |
Observations | 186 | 186 | 186 | 186 | 186 |
\(R^{2}\) | 0.257 | 0.303 | 0.273 | 0.261 | 0.321 |
Adjusted \(R^{2}\) | 0.241 | 0.284 | 0.253 | 0.241 | 0.295 |