Skip to main content

Table 3 Results obtained for type of feature from the survey

From: Learning to cluster urban areas: two competitive approaches and an empirical validation

Type of feature

SOCIAL

ALL

N

p-value

95% Conf. Interval

SOCIAL VS ALL

294

236

530

0.013

0.51–0.59

SOCIAL VS ALL / BLOCK

145

111

256

0.038

0.50–0.62

SOCIAL VS ALL / INDIVIDUAL

149

125

274

0.164

0.48–0.60

SOCIAL VS ALL / GMM

164

103

267

0.001

0.55–0.67

SOCIAL VS ALL / DMON

130

133

263

0.901

0.43–0.55

SOCIAL VS ALL / GLOBAL

169

131

300

0.032

0.51–0.62

SOCIAL VS ALL / LOCAL

125

105

230

0.210

0.47–0.60

 

VISUAL

ALL

N

p-value

95% Conf. Interval

VISUAL VS ALL

159

386

545

2.2E–16

0.25–0.33

VISUAL VS ALL / BLOCK

55

212

267

2.2E–16

0.15–0.25

VISUAL VS ALL / INDIVIDUAL

104

174

278

3.19E–05

0.31–0.43

VISUAL VS ALL / GMM

80

180

260

5.01E–10

0.25–0.36

VISUAL VS ALL / DMON

79

206

285

3.14E–14

0.22–0.33

VISUAL VS ALL / GLOBAL

115

226

341

1.86E–09

0.28–0.39

VISUAL VS ALL / LOCAL

44

160

204

2.2E–16

0.16–0.27

 

LANDUSE

ALL

N

p-value

95% Conf. Interval

LAND USE VS ALL

208

311

519

7.08E–06

0.35–0.44

LAND USE VS ALL / BLOCK

92

162

254

1.32E–05

0.31–0.42

LAND USE VS ALL / INDIVIDUAL

116

149

265

0.05

0.37–0.49

LAND USE VS ALL / GMM

107

149

256

0.01

0.35–0.48

LAND USE VS ALL / DMON

101

162

263

0.001

0.32–0.44

LAND USE VS ALL / GLOBAL

106

186

292

3.31E–06

0.31–0.42

LAND USE VS ALL / LOCAL

102

125

227

0.144

0.38–0.51

  1. * Significant results at the 5% are indicated with bold fonts.