Figure 4From: Academic support network reflects doctoral experience and productivityDeterminants of academic productivity and linguistic differences between extreme cases. Sentiment and productivity levels of students were normalized based on their disciplines and genders (a). Word usage differences are quantified by JS Divergence scores and compared students at the first and third quartiles based on normalized sentiment and productivity (b, c). Relationship between CWUR World rankings and normalized productivity levels (d). Relationship between CWUR World rankings and normalized number of mentions in acknowledgements (e). Relationship between CWUR World rankings and normalized sentiment scores in acknowledgements (f). R-squared values denote Spearman’s rank correlation. Size of blue dots is proportional to the number of theses from these institutionsBack to article page