Skip to main content

Table 1 Fitting parameters for the USA commuting data, considering the models given by equations (6), (7), (8), (3) and (16). The \(R^{2}\) values and fitted curves suggests that the FJM and GM models performs better than the simple RM, RMwS, or TCORM model. For the FJM model \(a=7/4\) was fixed

From: Commuting patterns: the flow and jump model and supporting data

  RM RMwS TCORM GM FJM
  μ μ q μ λ α β μ
USA data 0.0000308 0.0000308 1.0 0.000119 0.0056 1.2 1.2 0.000062
\(\mathbf{R}^{2}\) 0.971 0.971 0.992 0.993 0.993