Table 1 Referendums turnout, Blood donations, Association density represented by between and within synchronization, controlled for per-capita income were tested using commonality analysis. As for statistical significance of the beta weights, we use the following notation: \({}^{*}p<0.05\), \({}^{**}p<0.01\)
β (95% CI) | \({r_{s}}\) | \({U_{\mathrm{CA}}}\) | \({C_{\mathrm{CA}}}\) | \({\mathit{Tot}_{\mathrm{CA}}}\) | LMG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Referendums turnout | ||||||
(\(R^{2}_{\mathrm{adj}}\): 0.68) | ||||||
 Between sync | −0.12∗∗ (−0.20,−0.05) | −0.76 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.43 | 0.38 |
 Within sync | 0.09∗ (0.01,0.18) | −0.63 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.20 |
 Per-capita income | 0.06∗∗ (0.02,0.10) | 0.75 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 0.42 | 0.40 |
Blood donations | ||||||
(\(R^{2}_{\mathrm{adj}}\): 0.55) | ||||||
 Between sync | −24.91∗∗ (−40.44,−9.37) | −0.79 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 0.40 | 0.52 |
 Within sync | 19.49∗ (2.45,36.54) | −0.58 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.21 | 0.24 |
 Per-capita income | 8.49∗ (0.67,16.31) | 0.57 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.22 |
Association density | ||||||
(\(R^{2}_{\mathrm{adj}}\): 0.52) | ||||||
 Between sync | −21.88∗∗ (−37.54,−6.23) | −0.48 | 0.29 | −0.15 | 0.14 | 0.30 |
 Within sync | 22.96∗ (5.78,40.14) | −0.31 | 0.27 | −0.21 | 0.06 | 0.27 |
 Per-capita income | 13.00∗∗ (5.12,20.88) | 0.71 | 0.41 | −0.09 | 0.31 | 0.42 |