Skip to main content

Table 1 Referendums turnout, Blood donations, Association density represented by between and within synchronization, controlled for per-capita income were tested using commonality analysis. As for statistical significance of the beta weights, we use the following notation: \({}^{*}p<0.05\), \({}^{**}p<0.01\)

From: Is social capital associated with synchronization in human communication? An analysis of Italian call records and measures of civic engagement

  β (95% CI) \({r_{s}}\) \({U_{\mathrm{CA}}}\) \({C_{\mathrm{CA}}}\) \({\mathit{Tot}_{\mathrm{CA}}}\) LMG
Referendums turnout       
(\(R^{2}_{\mathrm{adj}}\): 0.68)       
 Between sync −0.12 (−0.20,−0.05) −0.76 0.27 0.16 0.43 0.38
 Within sync 0.09 (0.01,0.18) −0.63 0.13 0.16 0.30 0.20
 Per-capita income 0.06 (0.02,0.10) 0.75 0.30 0.12 0.42 0.40
Blood donations       
(\(R^{2}_{\mathrm{adj}}\): 0.55)       
 Between sync −24.91 (−40.44,−9.37) −0.79 0.36 0.03 0.40 0.52
 Within sync 19.49 (2.45,36.54) −0.58 0.18 0.03 0.21 0.24
 Per-capita income 8.49 (0.67,16.31) 0.57 0.16 0.04 0.21 0.22
Association density       
(\(R^{2}_{\mathrm{adj}}\): 0.52)       
 Between sync −21.88 (−37.54,−6.23) −0.48 0.29 −0.15 0.14 0.30
 Within sync 22.96 (5.78,40.14) −0.31 0.27 −0.21 0.06 0.27
 Per-capita income 13.00 (5.12,20.88) 0.71 0.41 −0.09 0.31 0.42
\