Figure 4
From: The canary in the city: indicator groups as predictors of local rent increases
Robustness of the indicator group across multiple cities. Comparing the rent price predictions of the indicator group and the reference group for New York City (indicator group: \(r_{s}=0.70\); \(p<10^{-4}\); \(N=25\), reference group: \(r_{s}=0.46\); \(p=0.03\); \(N=22\)), Los Angeles (indicator group: \(r_{s}=0.73\); \(p<10^{-4}\); \(N=23\)), Boston (indicator group: \(r_{s}=0.57\); \(p<10^{-2}\); \(N=20\)) and Portland (indicator group: \(r_{s}=0.67\); \(p<10^{-2}\); \(N=14\)). The correlation values for the reference group in Los Angeles, Boston and Portland are not significant (\(p>0.05\))