Table 2 Metrics of urban form and IMD with relative descriptions, means, and standard deviations
From: A scalable method to quantify the relationship between urban form and socio-economic indexes
Variable name | Description | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
Connected Node Ratio (CNR) | Level of connectivity of the street network | 0.74 | 0.08 |
Intersection Density (ID) | Density of street intersections | 0.62 | 0.33 |
Percentage of Unbuilt Land (PUL) | Proportion of land left unbuilt | 73.23 | 12.30 |
Population Density (PD) | Density of city dwellers | 62.76 | 43.15 |
Betweenness Centrality (BC) | Level of accessibility | 0.03 | 0.04 |
Percentage of Green Areas (PGA) | Amount of green areas | 7.93 | 8.19 |
Irregularity of the Street Network (ISN) | Level of irregularity of the street network | 0.37 | 0.06 |
Dead-end Density (DD) | Density of dead-end roads (cul-de-sac) | 0.20 | 0.11 |
Offering Advantage of Historic Properties (OAHP) | Weighted offering of historic properties | 0.90 | 0.99 |
Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) | Socio-economic deprivation | 24.16 | 13.07 |