Skip to main content

Table 8 Mean rank table for all datasets

From: SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods

3-classes 2-classes
Pos Method Mean Rank Pos Method Mean Rank Coverage (%)
1 VADER 4.00 (4.17) 1 SentiStrength 2.33 (3.00) 29.30 (28.91)
2 LIWC15 4.62 2 Sentiment140 3.44 39.29
3 AFINN 4.69 3 Semantria 4.61 62.34
4 Opinion Lexicon 5.00 4 Opinion Lexicon 6.72 69.50
5 Semantria 5.31 5 LIWC15 7.33 68.28
6 Umigon 5.77 6 SO-CAL 7.61 72.64
7 SO-CAL 7.23 7 AFINN 8.11 73.05
8 Pattern.en 9.92 8 VADER 9.17 (9.79) 82.20 (83.18)
9 Sentiment140 10.92 9 Umigon 9.39 64.11
10 Emolex 11.38 10 PANAS-t 10.17 5.10
11 Opinion Finder 13.08 11 Emoticons 10.39 10.69
12 SentiWordNet 13.38 12 Pattern.en 12.61 65.02
13 Sentiment140_L 13.54 13 SenticNet 13.61 84.00
14 SenticNet 13.62 14 Emolex 14.50 66.12
15 SentiStrength 13.69 (13.71) 15 Opinion Finder 14.72 46.63
16 SASA 14.77 16 USent 14.89 44.00
17 Stanford DM 15.85 17 Sentiment140_L 14.94 93.36
18 USent 15.92 18 NRC Hashtag 17.17 93.52
19 NRC Hashtag 16.31 19 Stanford DM 17.39 87.32
20 LIWC 16.46 20 SentiWordNet 17.50 61.77
21 ANEW_SUB 18.54 21 SASA 18.94 60.12
22 Emoticons 21.00 22 LIWC 19.67 61.82
23 PANAS-t 21.77 23 ANEW_SUB 21.17 94.20
24 Emoticons DS 23.23 24 Emoticons DS 23.61 99.36