Skip to main content

Table 10 Best method for each dataset - 2-class experiments

From: SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods

Dataset

Method

F 1-Pos

F 1-Neg

Macro- F 1

Coverage

Comments_BBC

SentiStrength

70.59

96.61

83.60

32.85

Comments_Digg

SentiStrength

84.96

94.64

89.80

27.49

Comments_NYT

SentiStrength

70.11

86.52

78.32

17.63

Comments_TED

Emoticons

85.71

94.12

89.92

1.65

Comments_YTB

SentiStrength

96.94

89.62

93.28

38.24

Reviews_I

SenticNet

97.39

93.66

95.52

69.41

Reviews_II

SenticNet

94.15

93.87

94.01

94.25

Myspace

SentiStrength

98.73

88.46

93.6

31.53

Amazon

SentiStrength

93.85

79.38

86.62

19.58

Tweets_DBT

Sentiment140

72.86

83.55

78.2

18.75

Tweets_RND_I

SentiStrength

95.28

90.6

92.94

27.13

Tweets_RND_II

VADER

99.31

98.45

98.88

94.4

Tweets_RND_III

Sentiment140

97.57

95.9

96.73

50.77

Tweets_RND_IV

Emoticons

94.74

86.76

88.6

58.27

Tweets_STF

SentiStrength

95.76

94.81

95.29

41.78

Tweets_SAN

SentiStrength

90.23

88.59

89.41

29.61

Tweets_Semeval

SentiStrength

93.93

83.4

88.66

28.66

RW

SentiStrength

90.04

75.79

82.92

23.12