From: SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods
Dataset | Method | F 1-Pos | F 1-Neg | Macro- F 1 | Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comments_BBC | SentiStrength | 70.59 | 96.61 | 83.60 | 32.85 |
Comments_Digg | SentiStrength | 84.96 | 94.64 | 89.80 | 27.49 |
Comments_NYT | SentiStrength | 70.11 | 86.52 | 78.32 | 17.63 |
Comments_TED | Emoticons | 85.71 | 94.12 | 89.92 | 1.65 |
Comments_YTB | SentiStrength | 96.94 | 89.62 | 93.28 | 38.24 |
Reviews_I | SenticNet | 97.39 | 93.66 | 95.52 | 69.41 |
Reviews_II | SenticNet | 94.15 | 93.87 | 94.01 | 94.25 |
Myspace | SentiStrength | 98.73 | 88.46 | 93.6 | 31.53 |
Amazon | SentiStrength | 93.85 | 79.38 | 86.62 | 19.58 |
Tweets_DBT | Sentiment140 | 72.86 | 83.55 | 78.2 | 18.75 |
Tweets_RND_I | SentiStrength | 95.28 | 90.6 | 92.94 | 27.13 |
Tweets_RND_II | VADER | 99.31 | 98.45 | 98.88 | 94.4 |
Tweets_RND_III | Sentiment140 | 97.57 | 95.9 | 96.73 | 50.77 |
Tweets_RND_IV | Emoticons | 94.74 | 86.76 | 88.6 | 58.27 |
Tweets_STF | SentiStrength | 95.76 | 94.81 | 95.29 | 41.78 |
Tweets_SAN | SentiStrength | 90.23 | 88.59 | 89.41 | 29.61 |
Tweets_Semeval | SentiStrength | 93.93 | 83.4 | 88.66 | 28.66 |
RW | SentiStrength | 90.04 | 75.79 | 82.92 | 23.12 |